Jacqueline Omania: Shrinky Dinks and Black-footed Albatrosses, July 20, 2025

Erica, Chad, and Jacqueline stand around one end of a wooden table in the wet lab and smile for a photo. Erica wears a teal sweatshirt with a small NOAA logo; Chad's sweater sports a National Marine Sanctuaries logo; Jacqueline wears her Teacher at Sea t-shirt and beanie. On the table are notebooks, datasheets, a walkie talkie.

NOAA Teacher at Sea

Jacqueline Omania

Aboard NOAA Ship Reuben Lasker

July 14- July 24, 2025

Mission: Oceanographic and Biological Monitoring of Davidson Seamount

Geographic Area: Davidson Seamount/Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary

Date: July 20, 2025

Weather Data from the Bridge

Latitude: 35° 36.65’ N

Longitude: 122° 47.97’ W

Wind Speed: 13 knots

Wave Height: 4-5’

Air Temperature: 15.3C/59F

Sky:  Overcast

Science and Technology Log: 

We have finished five transects with two left to go. Today (Saturday 7/19) we had the deepest drop to 2000 meters and collected eDNA samples for future processing by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI). The work with eDNA (DNA shed from animals that have been in the area in the last 24-48 hours) compliments the first hand observations that the scientists on the deck are making. These samples are sent to MBARI and will be processed in 1-2 years. The time does seem long, yet the greatest challenge is getting the samples in the first place. So we are doing the essential work towards developing a deeper understanding of species distribution and how seamounts may be influencing the ocean’s biodiversity.

Once the CTD measurements and water sample collection is done at a station location, the ship moves again to the next CTD location on the transect. While the ship is moving along the transect, the seabird and mammal scientists are at work on the flying bridge (top deck of the ship) counting species seen within the observation zone (as detailed in previous post). So far, in five days of research, we have the following results.

  1. Tuesday: 331 observations- 284 seabirds, 47 mammals
  2. Wednesday: 303 observations- 274 seabirds (107 Red-necked Phalaropes), 29 mammals (19 fur seals, 6 whales)
  3. Thursday: 173 observations- 120 seabirds (mostly Red-necked Phalaropes, storm petrels and Ashy Storm Petrels), 53 mammals (mostly fur seals, whales and dolphins)
  4. Friday: 136 observations- 92 seabirds (mostly Leach’s Storm Petrels), 44 mammals
  5. Saturday: 74 observations- 40 seabirds, 34 mammals (mostly whales)

Our effort is adding up and we now have 994 observations! The team is happy as we have been having good weather and calm seas to allow for good observational data collection.

Alongside the research that we are working on, we are also having some fun with ‘ocean shrinky dinks’. As you descend in the ocean, the pressure changes, increasing one atmosphere (14.7 pounds/ sq. inch) for every 10 meters below sea level. Animals adapt in many ways to this changing pressure; whales collapse their lungs when they dive deep and rely on the oxygen in their blood and muscles during this time. We can see the results of this change if we send a material like styrofoam down; the pressure squeezes the air out and the item shrinks. The deeper the object goes, the more the air is squeezed out and the smaller it gets.

We decorated styrofoam that are in the shape of cones, bears and birds – thanks to marine ecologist Erica Burton who brought all the materials and decorating pens. We then attached these items in laundry bags to the CTD rosette on deeper drops of 1620m, 1710m and 2000m (the blue dots on the transect map shared in the last post). Once we pulled up the CTD rosette–voila! our ‘shrinky dinks’ were ready, at a fraction of the original size! I am very excited to share these tangible projects with my students as they learn about the ocean.

two styrofoam bears seated next to a cardboard ruler. one bear, plain white and smooth, is about 7 centimeters tall, and the other, decorated with marker, is wrinkled and only 5 centimeters high.
Styrofoam bears before and after 1620 meters immersion
close up view of two wrinkly styrofoam hearts. the left one is blue and says "Love So Deep." the right heart is a sunset over a wave with the words "Sunk 2000 meters"
Styrofoam hearts by Cassandra Dahl, survey tech after 2000 meters immersion.

Meet the Science Team!

I would like to introduce the team behind all this amazing science. Our chief scientist is Chad King, a research ecologist from Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS), also known for being the chief scientist on the 2018-2020 EV Nautilus expeditions with Ocean Exploration Trust that discovered the octopus garden along the flanks of Davidson Seamount at 3200 meters deep. A fun fact is that back in 2019, my class scored a virtual interaction with the Nautilus as it explored the deep ocean, with Chad as our ship-to-shore connection. Chad answered many of my students’ questions about studying the deep sea while actually on board the Nautilus. I never imagined that one day I would be able to join him on a research mission!

Assisting Chad with the CTD and eDNA work in the wet lab is Erica Burton, also a research ecologist from MBNMS. Erica specializes in ichthyology (study of fish), but has co-authored many research papers and the Davidson Seamount Taxonomic Guide, so she is known as a species expert. I am grateful to both of them for taking the time to explain the details of their work with me and for teaching me how to do eDNA sampling.

Erica, Chad, and Jacqueline stand around one end of a wooden table in the wet lab and smile for a photo. Erica wears a teal sweatshirt with a small NOAA logo; Chad's sweater sports a National Marine Sanctuaries logo; Jacqueline wears her Teacher at Sea t-shirt and beanie. On the table are notebooks, datasheets, a walkie talkie.
Erica Burton (research ecologist), Chad King (chief scientist) and myself in the wet lab.
Chad stands at a wooden table in the wet lab, a tablet on the table in front of him. He has his right hand pulled into his jacket sleeve as he grasps a miniature silicone (maybe) hand which he is using to write on, or pretend to write on, the tablet.
Chad King (chief scientist) entering data in the wet lab.

Interview with Chad King:

Chad is a research ecologist with MBNMS who has a background in kelp forest ecology, GIS and he is an expedition diver and diver trainer with NOAA. He has been working with NOAA since 2008 and has been involved in various projects with the sanctuary including microplastic monitoring. He lives in Gilroy with his wife and two children Maya and Noah. Maya is studying at UC Berkeley and Noah is in high school.

Why is your work important?

Regular research, with our partners, is important for the sanctuary because we study priority or new issues such as kelp loss and microplastics, but we are also working on the ongoing characterization and exploration of the sanctuary. Exploration is so valuable because you don’t know what you will find.

What do you enjoy about your work? What is a challenge?

I enjoy the variety of work- I get to be a “jack of all trades”- and do different work week to week. It is fresh and engaging and I am exposed to more subjects related to the sanctuary. A challenge is having enough time to analyze the data since I am moving from project to project.

When did you know you wanted an ocean focused career?

As a child I feared the ocean, and over the years I learned that the best way to overcome fear was with knowledge. I watched a lot of ocean documentaries by Jacques Cousteau and visited the Monterey Bay Aquarium. By middle school, I knew I wanted to be a marine biologist. After high school, I went to UC Santa Cruz and majored in marine biology. After trying out working in real estate for 4 years, I returned to marine biology for a master’s degree from Moss Landing Marine Lab.

What book/activity do you recommend to a young person interested in an ocean focused career?

Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History is an engaging book that focuses on science and critical thinking skills. Reading it turned me on to science. I also recommend trying snorkeling as early as you can. Also, if it is possible, become a certified SCUBA diver. You can do so as early as age 10.

The Bird and Mammal Team

While Erica and Chad work in the wet lab, on the flying bridge are the bird and mammal specialists from Point Blue Conservation Science. Point Blue is a group of  “160 scientists who work to reduce the impacts of climate change, habitat loss, and other environmental threats while developing nature-based solutions to benefit both wildlife and people.”

On our mission we have biologists Jim Tietz, Rudy Wallen, Julie Howar and Mike Johns from Point Blue. We also have Holly Lohuis, a marine life naturalist from Island Packers; Melissa Ashley, a CA Sea Grant Fellow; and NOAA Hollings Scholar Kylie Marozsan.

A group photo of three men and three women standing in a line under the shade of an upper deck of NOAA Ship Reuben Lasker. All but one of them have a pair of binoculars hanging around their necks.
Bird and Mammal Team: Kylie Marozsan, Julie Howar, Mike Johns, Rudy Wallen, Holly Lohuis, and Jim Tietz on the flying bridge.
portrait photo of a man wearing a warm coat seated on an observing chair next to the ship's railing. he's grasping binoculars in both hands, but holding them down from his face so he can smile for the camera.
Mike Johns, Point Blue Marine Scientist

Interview with Marine Ecologist Mike Johns

Mike Johns is a senior marine ecologist on our team. He works for Point Blue Conservation Science which is based in Petaluma. His focus is seabird studies and the Farallon Islands. He lives in Tacoma, Washington with his husband and his dog Noosa.

Why is your work important?

My work brings an understanding of how seabirds and the ecosystem depend on one another and respond to changes in our planet. I’m documenting how our actions impact the organisms we share our planet with.

What do you enjoy about your work?

I enjoy collecting data in the field through hands-on studies of birds, and once back at the office, revealing hidden patterns with long term data sets and creating engaging graphics – like animations of plots – that the general public can learn from.

What is a challenge?

Navigating the politics of work and staying funded are challenges. Working remotely is hard because you have no friends to bounce ideas off of.

When did you know you wanted an ocean focused career?

I’ve always loved camping in the Sierra Nevada as a kid, and surfing – once I discovered the ocean. Right after high school, at the age of 18, I worked as a deck hand on a whale watching boat in Monterey. The whales were cool, but I was captivated by the sea birds and how they can be the tiny size of a sparrow and spend their whole life at sea.

What was your path to becoming a marine ecologist ?

I attended CSU Monterey Bay and majored in environmental science. After graduating, in the summer of 2012- from March to August- I did the Farallon Seabird Internship. I lived in an 1850’s lighthouse keeper’s house with 4-8 others and was immersed in wildlife and the ocean. Whenever you went outside the Western Gulls were attacking us! On the Farallones, I learned about observation, banding and other elements of field research. This experience gave me the background to get other projects. I have worked on various sea bird projects in the Bering Sea (Alaska), Hawaii and Tasmania.

What books and activities do you recommend to someone who is interested in an ocean focused career?

Carl Safina has written many books on the ocean. I recommend Song for the Blue Ocean and Eye of the Albatross. For activities, I recommend tidepooling, bird and whale watching and …. looking at a droplet of water under a microscope.

portrait photo of a woman wearing a bright orange coat and a knit hat that says Antarctica; she gazes out of frame; we can see the rail and the ocean behind her
Holly Lohuis, Island Packers Naturalist

Interview with Naturalist Holly Lohuis

Holly is a naturalist with Island Packers, the boat concession to Channel Islands National Park and marine educator with the Santa Barbara Maritime Museum. She also is the co-director of the newly designated Santa Barbara Channel Whale Heritage Area and has been an expedition diver and marine biologist with Jean-Michel Cousteau (son of Jacques Cousteau) and his marine conservation organization, Ocean Futures Society since 2002. She lives in Carpinteria with her partner Chuck and son, Gavin.

Why is your work important?

The ocean covers over 70% of our planet and contains over 90% of the living space. Yet, there are many unknowns about the ocean, especially in the deep sea and the rich diversity of marine life around seamounts. That’s why long-term monitoring by the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) is vital for informing decisions about preserving these unique ecosystems.

What do you enjoy about your work here at Davidson Seamount?

I love being part of a team where the crew and scientists all share a deep passion for ocean conservation. Every day, I’m learning something new—especially about seabird species—thanks to the expertise of our seabird biologists. 

What is a challenge?

It is a challenge to be away from home but my work for decades has taken me away from home, traveling around the world with Jean-Michel Cousteau and his expedition team. But I still miss Chuck, Gavin, my friends, family and my cat Avalon. 

When did you know you wanted an ocean focused career?

In 5th grade, my teacher Ms. Brown asked us to do a report on who we wanted to be when we grew up. I chose Sylvia Earle because I was fascinated by her deep-sea dives and ocean exploration. I also loved watching the Undersea World of Jacques Cousteau and like many people, I dreamed of being a silver suited diver on Cousteau’s team. Growing up landlocked in Sacramento, I knew I’d eventually want to live by the ocean.

What was your path to becoming a naturalist?

I went to UC Santa Barbara and majored in aquatic biology. In my last year of college, I interned at the Marine Mammal Rescue Center in Santa Barbara. After graduating, I worked at a local dive center in Santa Barbara and then with Island Packers. I also connected with Jean-Michel Cousteau and was hired as a diver and marine biologist at his small eco-resort in Fiji. My experiences both aboard Island Packers’ boats and while working in Fiji deepened my passion for educating others about the incredible diversity and delicate nature of both kelp forests and coral reefs, and how each of us can make a meaningful difference in protecting our ocean.

What books and activities and advice do you have to someone who is interested in an ocean focused career? 

I recommend any books by Dr. Sylvia Earle like The World is Blue and Sea Change. I also love books by Carl Safina, Susan Casey and Cullum Roberts.

Take advantage of internship opportunities. Volunteer for local marine or coastal organizations and meet like-minded people who can be mentors and help with job opportunities.

Getting scuba certified can open up many opportunities in marine science and conservation work.

Go whale watching! Follow your curiosity. Learn the science. Spend time in, on, and near the ocean. And most of all—share what you love with others. Ocean careers need storytellers, scientists, educators, and advocates working together.  

Personal Log:

I am getting into my routine of waking up and joining the observation crew on the flying bridge. It is such a beautiful gift to be out on the Pacific learning to do bird and mammal observations. I am gaining observation skills and have been seeing so many more animals. I know now how to spot groups of whales far out on the horizon. I have observed minke and blue whales and marveled as Laysan Albatross and Black-footed Albatrosses gently glide over the surface of the water. I am so happy to learn about these types of albatrosses in Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. My students and I have been studying albatrosses in the context of Antarctic animals and now I have the knowledge to teach about these local species.

The animal observations on the flying bridge last approximately 45 minutes to one hour and then there is a break during CTD rosette deployment stops. Some scientists go for coffee and snacks; others -like Holly- go to the gym and run a mile on the treadmill. Holly has been an inspiration and I am also going down to the gym to work out once a day (Holly goes 3 times a day to run over 3 miles!). I am quite proud of myself for being able to do cycling and the elliptical machine with all the rocking of the boat. The waves are getting a bit stronger these days and I am adapting.

exercise equipment in the workout room
Gym on the Reuben Lasker

I have also been getting to know many of the people on board that are supporting the work of the scientists- both NOAA Corps and the crew. I have been interviewing some of them to prepare for future posts. Our meals continue to be amazing; tonight for Sunday dinner we had steak and lobster as an option. On every cruise, there is a special meal night and tonight was that night. There’s always a vegetarian option as well as a large salad bar at every meal. Tonight’s special desert was the ice cream sundae which is appropriate since it was World Ice Cream Day!

We are also building community aboard the ship as time passes. It is a bit like being in a dorm in college; however, we are even more tightly together since the ship is our only place to go. Yet, it is wonderful to share a space so closely with people that have a passion for science, the ocean and its conservation. With shipboard life, they also have the time and interest to share their knowledge. I am learning so much from every person I meet. I am also amazed that so many people – especially on the crew- have worked in Antarctica.

We are also having fun. On Saturday, we had a barbeque with a cooking challenge. The crew set up a cornhole game on the lower deck. In the evenings, after dinner and after our 8 o’clock science meeting, we play card games. Amity, my roommate, leads these with a treasure chest of games she has brought on board. I have learned several new and wonderful card games – like Skyjo and Exploding Kittens- to share with my class.

a game of cornhole on deck. Jacqueline, wearing her Teacher at Sea hat and t shirt, takes a step forward as she tosses a red bean bag across the way. her competitor, Mike, stands back with a pile of bean bags in his hand. in between is a white cornhole board with some bean bags resting on it. behind them, the sky is cloudy and the water is gray.
Cornhole at sea
six people sit around a table, mid card game. in the background is an array of computer monitors with screensavers images from Finding Nemo
Card games – our nightly pastime

Did you know?

Black-footed Albatross nest in the Hawaiian Islands and 98% of the species lives there. They mate for life, lay one egg per clutch and are very long lived; the oldest recorded was a male at nearly 61 years old. They have a keen sense of smell and can detect their favorite food as they glide over the vast ocean. Their wingspan averages 6’9”. Like other seabirds, the albatross can drink saltwater because it has special glands above the eyes that excrete the salt out of their tubenose bill.  Black-footed Albatross are on the threatened species list and are threatened by plastic pollution, oil spills and long line fishing. 

a bird flying just above the surface of the ocean. it has black feet.
Black-footed Albatross flying in the sanctuary
Photo Credit: Jim Tietz

Cara Nelson: Report from the Flying Bridge, September 16, 2019

NOAA Teacher at Sea

Cara Nelson

Aboard USFWS R/V Tiglax

September 11-25, 2019


Mission: Northern Gulf of Alaska Long-Term Ecological Research project

Geographic Area of Cruise: Northern Gulf of Alaska – currently sampling along the Seward line.

Date: September 16, 2019

Weather Data from the Bridge:

Time: 16:10
Latitude: 59º36.465’
Longitude: 149º14.346’
Wind: North 12 knots
Air Temperature: 16ºC (61ºF)
Air Pressure: 1001 millibars
Clear skies


Science and Technology Log

The Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) study focuses on ecosystem dynamics in the Northern Gulf of Alaska (NGA) and how the complex processes of abiotic factors, such as ocean salinity, temperature, currents, and trace metals influence primary productivity of phytoplankton.  The project examines how efficiently this energy is transferred, in turn, to higher trophic levels, from zooplankton to vertebrates, such as fish, seabirds and marine mammals. 

Over the past twenty years, seabird and marine mammal observations have been an important component of the LTER study. Approximately 50 species of birds inhabit the NGA either year-round or seasonally, with a variety of foraging behaviors and diets. Through the LTER, we can learn about how physical and biological oceanographic processes influence the distribution and abundance of higher trophic levels, such as seabirds.

Dr. Kathy Kuletz with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is the lead scientist for the seabird part of the research program. Dan Cushing is the seabird and marine mammal observer aboard R/V Tiglax.  He holds a master’s degree in wildlife science and has a wealth of experience in birding both on and offshore.  This fall cruise marks Dan’s eleventh cruise observing in the NGA.  Whenever the R/V Tiglax is underway, Dan can be found on the flying bridge collecting data. 

flying bridge
The flying bridge (named for its bird’s eye view) is an open viewing area atop the wheel-house of R/V Tiglax accessed by a ladder.

Observations are made using a protocol established through the USFWS.  Dan records survey data using a computer on the flying bridge that records both time and GPS coordinates of each bird or mammal sighting. 

Dan on flying bridge
Dan actively observing on the flying bridge.
estimating distance
A chopstick with markings on it helps Dan estimate bird distance. Dan made this simple distance measuring tool using high-school trigonometry. When the top of the stick is placed on the horizon, the markings along the stick correspond to distances from the boat.
observing laptop
Dan is able to quickly document the species seen, abundance and any special notes using the computer program.

It is immediately clear that bird sightings along the LTER follow a pattern.  Inshore, diving bird species are common, such as common murres, puffins and cormorants.  Pelagic bird species inhabiting deeper waters are mostly surface-feeders, and rely on processes such as fronts and upwellings at the shelf break to concentrate prey at the surface where feeding occurs.  Albatross, shearwaters and storm-petrels are abundant as we head further out on our sampling lines.  

birds on the dock
Pelagic cormorants and black-legged kittiwakes sit on the dock in Seward prior to our departure.
black-footed albatross
A black-footed albatross. Photo credit: Dan Cushing

Dan’s experience on the LTER study is helpful in that he can comment on both changes he sees from the spring, summer and fall cruises but also over the past several years.  For example, in winter 2015-16, a large die-off event of common murres was observed in Alaska following an extreme warming event called “the blob” in the North Pacific.  The murre die off was due to starvation from lack of forage fish availability.  A question of the LTER study is how is the ocean chemistry, primary production, and zooplankton abundance tied to events such as this. Today, the murre numbers have not completely rebounded in the NGA and other species, such as the short-tailed shearwater are beginning to experience die-offs in the Bristol Bay area.   In addition to shifts in bird populations, fish that frequent warmer waters, have been observed in the NGA, such as the ocean sunfish.  Dan spotted one on this trip along our Middleton line swimming at the surface near a flock of albatross. 

The fall survey is occurring when birds are preparing for harsh winter conditions or long migrations.  We have spotted a few birds already changing to a winter plumage, which can make identification that much more challenging.  As the strong September storms hit us, it is amazing to watch the birds handle the strong winds and driving rain.  Last night as we worked on our nightly plankton tow a gale blew up around us.  The winds picked up to 30 knots and the seas began to build to 10 feet, and the aptly named storm-petrels kept us entertained.  At one point, we turned around and one had accidently gotten to close and seemingly stunned itself by hitting the back deck.  We watched as it shook off the confusion and again took flight into the storm. 

fork-tailed storm petrel
A fork-tailed storm petrel. Photo credit: Dan Cushing

One of the exciting things about Dan’s job and my time observing with him was the sightings of rare and endangered species.  Just off of Cape Cleare, as I sat on the flying bridge with Dan, I heard him exclaim, “no way!” as he grabbed his camera for some shots.  After a few quiet moments, he shared that he had officially has his first sighting a Manx shearwater.  The Manx shearwater has a primary range in the Atlantic Ocean, with rare but regular (1-2 per year) sightings in the NGA.  There currently are no confirmed breeding locations identified in the Pacific Ocean. Every new sighting adds to our limited understanding of this small and mysterious population. Another exciting observation, although more frequent for Dan, was the short-tailed albatross.  This beautiful bird, with its bubble-gum pink bill, is currently critically endangered, with a global population of only about 4000.  The good news is that the population is currently rebounding from extremely low numbers. 

short-tailed albatross
A short-tailed albatross. Picture credit: Dan Cushing

Dan has not only done an amazing job as an observer but also as a teacher.  He has helped me identify the birds as we see them and given me tips on how to hone in on particular species.  In addition to this, he has supplied me with amazing facts about so many of the species, I am in awe of his knowledge, patience and his skill as a seabird and mammal observer.

Cara observing
I am getting better at identifying northern fulmars on a beautiful evening on the flying bridge.


Personal Log

One of the biggest questions I had (as well as my students) prior to my trip, was how would I handle sea sickness.  I must say for a person who used to get sea sick snorkeling, I am thrilled to announce that I am sea sickness free.  After riding through three strong gales with 12+ seas and 35-40 knot winds without any major problems, I think I’m in the clear.  I owe a lot of it to consistent Bonine consumption!

Additionally, I would say I officially have my sea legs on. I have gotten really good at working, walking, eating, typing, and my brushing my teeth in high seas as the boat tosses about.  One of my favorite phrases is when Captain John says, “the seas are going to get a bit snappy.” I asked him what he meant by this and he explained that snappy means the waves are sharp and about 8-12 feet in height in contrast to the swells.  They hit the ship with a snap that causes it to vibrate, rather than just allowing it to slowly roll over them. 

A last thing that has surprised me on this trip so far is the warm weather.  I am typically always cold and was worried about how I would manage working outside on the nightshift in the elements.  The weather, despite intermittent storms has remained surprisingly warm and with our mustang suits and rain gear, we have remained mostly dry.  Almost daily we have had the pleasure of a beautiful ocean sunset, a full moon rising and stars over our heads.  Now we are just crossing our fingers for some northern lights to grace our presence.

sunset
Another sunset over the Northern Gulf of Alaska!


Animals Seen from the Flying Bridge

Mammals:

Fin whale
Humpback whale
Dall’s porpoise
Harbor porpoise
Stellar sea lion
Harbor seal
Sea otter

Birds:

Greater scaup
White-winged scoter
Sandhill crane
Red-necked phalarope
Red phalarope
South polar skua
Pomarine jaeger
Parasitic jaeger
Commone murre
Thick-billed murre
Pigeon guillemot
Marbled murrelet
Ancient murrelet
Parakeet auklet
Horned puffin
Tufted puffin
Black-legged kittiwake
Mew gull
Herring gull
Glaucous-winged gull
Arctic tern
Pacific loon
Common loon
Laysan albatross
Black-footed albatross
Short-tailed albatross
Fork-tailed storm-petrel
Northern fulmar
Buller’s shearwater
Short-tailed shearwater
Sooty shearwater
Flesh-footed shearwater
Manx shearwater
Red-footed booby
Double-crested cormorant
Red-faced cormorant
Pelagic cormorant
Great blue heron
Northern harrier
Bald eagle
Merlin

Staci DeSchryver: Boobies, Wedgies, and the Neurolinguistic Re-Programming of a TAS, July 21, 2017

NOAA Teacher At Sea

Staci DeSchryver

Aboard Oscar Elton Sette

July 6 – August 2, 2017

 

Mission:  HICEAS Cetacean Study

Geographic Area:  French Frigate Shoals, Northwest Hawaiian Islands

Date:  July 21, 2017

Weather Data from the Bridge:

 

Science and Personal Log

I’m putting both the science and personal log together this time around for a very special reason.

See, I have a confession to make.  Many of my friends from home know this about me, but I have a secret I’ve kept under wraps for the vast majority of this trip, and it’s time to officially reveal it now, because it just seems to fit so well.  Ready?  True confessions from a Teacher At Sea:

I have an irrational fear of birds.

There.  I said it.  It stems from a wayward trip to London in the Study Abroad program and involves me, innocently consuming an over-priced deli sandwich on a bench outside of the Museum of Natural History when I was suddenly accosted by a one-footed pigeon who made away with my lunch – but not before attacking my face full-force with every wing, beak, and claw it had.  My lunch then became a free sidewalk hoagie, available for all nearby pigeons (you know, like every pigeon from London to France) to feast upon as I sat helplessly watching the gnashing of beaks and flyings of feathers in a ruthless battle to the end for over-processed deli ham and havarti on rye.  I was mortified.  From that moment forth, I was certain every bird wanted a piece of my soul and I was darned if I was going to let them have it.

After many years of active bird-avoidance, my first Teacher At Sea experience allowed me to remove Puffin from the exhaustive list of these ruthless prehistoric killers.  After all, Puffins are not much more than flying footballs, and generally only consume food of the underwater persuasion, so I felt relatively sheltered from their wrath.  Plus they’re kind of cute.  The following year, a Great Horned Owl met its demise by colliding face-first into one of our tall glass windows at the school. When the Biology teachers brought him inside, I felt oddly curious about this beast who hunts with stunning accuracy in the black of night, and yet couldn’t manage to drive himself around a window.  I felt myself incongruously empathetic at the sight of him – he was such a majestic creature, his lifeless body frozen in time from the moment he met his untimely ending.   I couldn’t help but wish him alive again; if not for his ability to hunt rodents, but simply because nothing that beautiful should have to meet its maker in such a ridiculous manner.  And so, I cautiously removed Owls from the list, so long as I didn’t have to look much at their claws.

This has suited me well over the years – fear all birds except for Puffin and Owl, and as a side note Penguin, too, since they can’t do much damage without being able to fly and all.  Plus, you know, Antarctica.  But when I found out that the cetacean study also happened to have bird observers on the trip, I felt momentarily paralyzed by the whole ordeal.  I had (incorrectly) assumed that we wouldn’t see birds on this trip.  I mean, what kind of bird makes its way to the middle of the Pacific Ocean?  Well, it turns out there are a lot that do, and it’s birders Dawn and Chris who are responsible for sighting and cataloging them alongside the efforts of the marine mammal observers.  I promise I’ll come back to my story on bird fear, but for now, let’s take a look at how our birders do their job.

DES_4224
NOAA bird observer Dawn scans the horizon from her seat on the flying bridge

The birders follow a similar protocol to the marine mammal observers.  Each birder takes a two-hour shift in a front seat on the flying bridge.  While the marine mammal observers use big eyes to see out as far as they possibly can out onto the horizon, the birders only watch and catalog birds that come within 300m of the ship.

DES_4623
You can find the distance a bird is from the ship using a basic pencil with lines marked on the side. Each line is mathematically calculated using your height, the ship’s height, and the distance to the horizon.

How do they know how far away the 300m mark is?  Over the years they just become great visual judges of the distance, but they also have a handy “range finder” that they use.  The range finder is just a plain, unsharpened pencil with marks ticked off at 100m intervals.  By holding the pencil up to the horizon and looking past it, they can easily find the distance the bird is from the ship. They divide this 300m range into “zones” – the 200-300m zone, the 100-200m zone, and the less than 100m zone from the bow of the ship.  Anything further than 300m or outside of the zero to 90 degree field of vision can still be catalogued if it is an uncommon species, or a flock of birds.  (More on flocks in a moment.)

They choose which side of the ship has the best visibility, either the port or starboard side, and like the mammal observers, birders take only the directional space from zero (directly in front of the ship) to 90 degrees on the side of their choosing.  If the visibility switches in quality from one side to the other during a shift, he or she can change sides without issue.

DES_4579
A sooty tern soars high above the ship. We’ve seen many sooty terns this trip!

The bird team also records information such as wind speed and direction (with respect to the ship), the Beaufort Sea State, visibility, observation conditions, and the ship’s course.  Observation conditions are a critical component of the birder’s tool bag.  They mark the observation conditions on a five-point scale, with 1 being extremely bad conditions and 5 being very good conditions.  What defines good conditions for a birder? The best way to make an observation about the conditions is to think about what size and species of smaller birds an observer might not be able to see in the outermost range. Therefore, the condition is based on species and distance from the ship.  Some birds are larger than others, and could be easier to spot farther out from the ship.  The smallest birds (like petrels) might not be observable in even slightly less than ideal conditions. Therefore, if a birder records that the conditions are not favorable for small birds at a distance of 200m (in other words, they wouldn’t be able to see a small bird 200m away), the data processing team can vary the density estimates for smaller birds when observers are in poor visibility.

DES_4568
White terns look like they belong on holiday cards! A new favorite of mine.

If a bird flies into the designated “zone”, the species is identified and recorded on a computer program that will place a time stamp on the GPS location of the sighting. These data are stored on the ship for review at a later time.  Ever wonder where the maps of migration patterns for birds originate?  It is from this collected data.  Up until this point, I had always taken most of these kinds of maps for granted, never thinking that in order to figure out where a particular animal lives let alone its migratory pattern must come from someone actually going out and observing those animals in those particular areas.

DES_4703
An albatross glides behind the ship, looking for fish.

The birder will record other information about the bird sighting like age, sex (if able to identify by sight) and what the lil’ fella or gal is up to when observed.  Birds on the open ocean do a lot more than just fly, and their behaviors are important to document for studies on bird behavior.  There are 9 different codes for these behaviors, ranging from things like directional flight (think, it has a place to go and it’s trying to get there), sitting on the water, or “ship attracted.”  There are certain species like juvenile Red-Footed and Brown boobies and Tropic Birds that are known to be “ship attracted.”  In other words, it could be out flying along a particular path until it sees this super cool giant white thing floating on the water, and decides to go and check it out.  This is how I wound up with that fun photo of the Booby on the bridge wing, and the other snapshot of the juvenile that hung out on the jackstaff for two full days.  These birds would not normally have otherwise come into the range to be detected and recorded, so their density estimates can be skewed if they are counted the same way as all other birds.

DES_4491
This Brown Booby wants in on the food action near the ship. Boobies are ship attracted, and we’ve had a few hang out with us while they take a rest on the mast. This is not the exact booby that made me change my bird ways, but he’s a close cousin (at least genetically speaking) of the one who did.

Any groups of five or more birds within one “reticle” (a measuring tool on the glass of the big eyes seen when looking through them) can be flagged by the marine mammal observers for the birders.  While many flocks are found miles away and might be difficult to see in the big eyes by species, the birders know the flight and feeding behaviors of the birds, and can usually identify the different species within the flock. They have a special designation in their computer program to catalog flocks and their behavior, as well.

I sat with Dawn on a few different occasions to learn how she quickly identifies and catalogs each bird species.  At first, it seems like all the birds look fairly similar, but after a few hours of identification practice, I can’t imagine that any of them look the same. The first bird Dawn taught me to identify was a Wedge-Tailed White Shearwater, more affectionately known as a “Wedgie White.”  To me, they were much more easily characterized by behavior than anything else.  Shearwaters are called “Shearwaters” because they…you guessed it… shear the water!  They are easy to spot as they glide effortlessly just above the water’s surface, almost dipping their wings in the cool blue Pacific.

I then continued my bird observation rotation learning all kinds of fun facts about common sea birds – how plumages change as different species grow, identifying characteristics (which I’m still trying to sort out because there are so many!), stories of how the birds got their names, migration patterns, population densities, breeding grounds, and what species we could expect to see as we approached different islands on the Northwest Hawaiian Island Chain.  Dawn knows countless identifiers when it comes to birds, and if she can’t describe it exactly the way she wants to, she has multiple books with photos, drawings, and paragraphs of information cataloging the time the bird is born to every iteration of its markings and behaviors as it grows.  To be a birder means having an astounding bank of knowledge to tap into as they have a limited time to spot and properly identify many species before they continue on their journey across the Pacific.

DES_4517
This Great Frigate Bird was flying about fifteen feet overhead, with a mast directly in front of him as he flew. He’s looking around for birds to steal food from. The Hawaiian term for Frigate Bird is ‘Iwa, meaning “thief.”

After two weeks of watching for birds with Dawn and Chris, I feel like I can properly identify a few different species – Wedgies, Frigate Birds (these are the klepto-parasite birds that steal other birds’ dinners), Tropic Birds, two types of Terns, and boobies, though I can only best ID boobies when they are not in flight.  I find myself up on the flying bridge on independent observation rotations calling forward to the birder on rotation, “Was that a tern?”  And now, my identifying skills have vastly improved over the last few days as I have engaged in the process of this very important data collection.

So, what has become of my irrational bird fear?  Well, I have to be honest; much like Puffin and Owl, the Red-Footed Booby melted my heart.  There he was, perched on the bridge’s shade railing, a lonely little fellow staring up at me with no reservation about my presence or expectation of a sandwich.  There we were in the middle of a vast ocean, and he was all alone – simply looking for a place to rest his wings or search more earnestly for the hint of a delicious flying fish escaping the water.  I spent a fair amount of time photographing the little guy, working with my new camera to find some fun angles and depth of field, and playing with the lighting.  He was a willing and I daresay friendly participant in the whole process (in fact I wondered if he had seen a few episodes of America’s Next Top Model), and I felt myself softening my stance on placing the Red Footed Booby amongst the likes of attack pigeons.  By the end of our encounter, I had mentally noted that the Booby should now be placed on the “safe bird” list.

As I’ve spent more time with Dawn and Chris and learned more about each species, seabirds have one by one slowly migrated over to the safe list – to the point now where there are just too many to recite and I feel it is time after fifteen years to do away with the whole of it entirely.  As soon as I changed my perspective, the beauty of all of them have gradually emerged to the point where I can easily find something to appreciate (even admire) about each of the species we’ve seen.  Terns fight fiercely into the wind as they fly, but when they can catch a thermal or pose for an on-land photograph for an ID book, look dainty and regal in their appearance – as if they should be a staple part of every holiday display.  And baby Terns?  Doc (our Medical Doctor on board) showed me a photo of a tern chick that followed him around Midway Island last year and the lil’ guy was so darn cute it could make you cry glitter tears.  Today near French Frigate Shoals many of the species I’ve seen from afar came right up to the ship and glided effortlessly overhead, allowing me to observe them from a near perspective as they flew.  (None of them pooped on me, so if they weren’t off the list by that point, that act of grace alone should have sealed their fate for the positive.)  Frigate Birds can preen their feathers while they fly.  Watching each species cast their wings once and glide on the air while looking all around themselves was oddly entertaining, certainly peculiar, but also impressive.  I can’t walk on the ship looking anywhere besides exactly where I want to go and yet birds can fly five feet away from a mast and casually have a proper look about.

If this has taught me anything, it has shown me the truth in the statement that fear is just ignorance in disguise.  When I accidentally gave my bird aversion away during our quick stop at French Frigate Shoals (more on this in an upcoming blog post) many of the scientists said, “I’d have never guessed you were scared of birds.  How did you keep it secret?”  The easy answer is “Teacher Game Face.” But, more deeply rooted in that is a respect and admiration for those who enjoy the things that I’m afraid of.  Dawn and Chris have dedicated their entire careers to identifying and cataloging these creatures, and they are both so kind and respectable I find it hard to imagine that they would study anything unequal to the vast extent of their character.  Thankfully I learned this early enough on in the trip that it was easy to trust their judgement when it comes to Procellariiformes.   This experience is once-in-a-lifetime, and how short-sighted would I be to not want to explore every aspect of what goes on during this study because I’m a little (a lot) afraid?

In Colorado, before I ever left, I made a personal commitment to have a little chutzpah and learn what I can about the distant oceanic cousins of the sandwich thieves.  And when it came to that commitment, it meant genuinely digging in to learn as much as I can, not just pretend digging in to learn at little.  I figured if nothing else, simple repeated exposure in short bursts would be enough for me to neurolinguistically reprogram my way into bird world, and as it turns out, I didn’t even really need that.  I just needed to open up my eyes a little and learn it in to appreciation.  Learning from Dawn and Chris, who are both so emphatically enthusiastic about all things ornithology made me curious once again about these little beasts, who over the last two weeks have slowly transformed into beauties.

Sorry, pigeons.  You’re still on the list.

Pop Quiz

What is to date the silliest question or statement Staci has asked/made during her TAS experience?

  1.       In response to a rainy morning, “Yeah, when I woke up it sounded a little more ‘splashy’ than usual outside.”
  2.      “So, if Killer Whales sound like this, then what whale talk was Dory trying to do in Finding Nemo?”
  3.       “So, there is no such thing as a brown-footed booby?”
  4.      After watching an endangered monk seal lounging on the sand, “I kind of wish I had that life.”  (So…you want to be an endangered species? Facepalm.)
  5.       All of the above

If you guessed e, we’re probably related.